Creating Social Innovation: Lesson Learned from Community Development Practice at PT ANTAM UBP Emas Pongkor and PT Kilang Pertamina Internasional Unit III Plaju

Authors

  • Rizqyansyah Fitramadhana Prospect Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55381/ijsrr.v1i2.30

Keywords:

Community empowerment, corporate social responsibility, social innovation

Abstract

Human’s intractable problems are pushing people around the globe to create innovation. Social innovation discussions and practices had becoming global requirement that transforming the important to the future development. The government of Indonesia, through its Ministry of Environment and Forest, has inserted social innovation into their newest legal code. Permen LHK No. 1 Tahun 2021, for instance, challenges corporations to enact social innovation to sweep all the problems away. Unfortunately, that kind of expectation doesn't followed by clear instructions from the government leaving firms in a confusing situation. Spearheaded by that deficiency, this research aims to adumbrate several conditions which support the creation of social innovation. By evaluating two community empowerment-based social innovations at PT ANTAM UBP Emas Pongkor and PT Kilang Pertamina Internasional Unit III Plaju, this investigation wants to find out what is the specific precursor of social innovation. Using case study methodology, there are at least two factors contributing to social innovation in the community empowerment context. The first is scientific collaboration in the form of multidiscipline and interdiscipline. Second, social innovation needs the combination social responsibility model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and Quality in Social Research. New York: Routledge.

Farransahat, M., Damayanti, A., Suyatna, H., Indroyono, P., & Firdaus, R. S. (2020). Pengembangan Inovasi Sosial Digital: Studi Kasus Pasarsambilegi.id. Journal of Social Development Studies, 14-26.

Idris, A., & Hati, R. H. (2013). Social Entrepeneurship in Indonesia: Lessons from the Past. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 277-301.

Inspirasi, J. (2021, Desember 16). Jurnal Inspirasi. Diambil kembali dari http://jurnalinspirasi.co.id/2021/12/16/save-cikaniki-antam-tingkatkan-kualitas-penjernihan/

KLHK. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 Tentang Program Penilaian Peringkat Kinerja Perusahaan Dalam Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.

Maskur, F. (2021, Desember 30). Bisnis Indonesia. Diambil kembali dari https://bisnisindonesia.id/article/ekoriparian-ciguha-antarkan-antam-raih-proper-emas

Naveh, Z. (2005). Epilogue: Toward a Transdisciplinary Science of Ecological and Cultural Landscape Restoration. Restoration Ecology, 228-234.

Rion. (2021, November 4). Berita: Pengumuman. Diambil kembali dari Sekretariat Proper Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan: https://proper.menlhk.go.id/proper/berita/detail/345

Stock, P., & Burton, R. J. (2011). Defining Terms for Integrated (Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary) Sustainability Research. Sustainability, 1090-1110.

Tbk, P. A. (2021). Membangun Kinerja Bisnis, Lingkungan, dan Sosial yang Harmonis Untuk Berkelanjutan. Jakarta: PT Aneka Tambang Tbk.

Urama, K. C., & Acheampong, E. N. (2013). Social Innovation Creates Prosperous Societies. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9-11.

Widhagdha, M. F., & Anantanyu, S. (2022). Community Empowerment Based on Social Innovation "Kampung Pangan Inovatif" in Plaju Ulu, Palembang, South Sumatera. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 63-70.

Znaniecki, F. (1945). Controversies in Doctrine and Method. American Journal of Sociology.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-04