Development Communication Challenges in Preserving Tambi Coffee Farms and Revitalizing Critical Lands
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55381/ijsrr.v2i1.74Keywords:
development communication, critical land, development actorsAbstract
Critical land has caused concern among many stakeholders because it can have serious impacts. This has become the main agenda in sustainable development carried out by development actors. One form of revitalization is carried out by improving soil structure by planting coffee which is initiated through collaboration between institutions and involving the local community.
The study in this article uses a narrative review. The approach used is done by reviewing each article that develops from time to time and is considered possible and relevant as the basis for analysis. The data analysis used is a simplified approach. The steps taken in the simplified approach analysis are summarizing each piece of literature. Critical appraisal is carried out simultaneously to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the literature and to see the relationship between one literature and another.
This study found that development actors consisting of facilitators, mediators, other change agents, and beneficiaries, both between the government and the community or the private sector and the community, have challenges as well as decisive roles in building the face of development from various interest perspectives. Capacity building either through education, training, or improving the communication channels used determines the effectiveness of cooperation in the perspective of development communication that affects the success of development programs.
Downloads
References
Darmanto dan Sri Weningsih. (2014). Penguatan Kelembagaan Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan (LMDH) (Studi Kasus pada LMDH Argomulyo, Desa Tambi, Kecamatan Kejajar, Kabupaten Wonosobo). In Laporan Penelitian Keilmuan. Desember 2014.
Daya, R. A. (2019). The Filipinos and the Philippines in Nora Cruz Quebral’s development communication discourse: Strengthening communication’s groundedness in a nation’s context. International Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 15(2), 143–173. https://doi.org/10.21315/ijaps2019.15.2.6
Deilamy, F., & Bayat, B. (2015). Development Communication. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s6p361
Dila, S. (2007). Komunikasi Pembangunan, Pendekatan Terpadu. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Eko Windarto, Y., Bashit, N., Sari Ristianti, N., Ulfiana, D., & Trisnawati, D. (2020). Decision Support System for Determining Critical Land in Klaten Regency. E3S Web of Conferences, 202. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020206003
Finaka, A. W. (2021). Tanaman-tanaman Pencegah Erosi dan Bencana. https://indonesiabaik.id/infografis/tanaman-tanaman-pencegah-erosi-dan-bencana
Helmy, C. (2016). Kopi Pun Menyimpan Kebaikan untuk Bumi. http://pskl.menlhk.go.id/kliping/86-kopi-pun-menyimpan-kebaikan-untuk-bumi.html
Indardi. (2016). Komunikasi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat.
Karlen, D. L., Mausbach, M. J., Doran, J. W., Cline, R. G., Harris, R. F., & Schuman, G. E. (1997). Soil Quality: A Concept, Definition, and Framework for Evaluation (A Guest Editorial). Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61(1), 4–10.
Kuncoro, M. (2006). “Ekonomi Pembangunan.” Salemba Empat.
Maria, Irham, & S, H. (2022). The effect of environmental awareness on motivation in adopting farming conservation techniques in the various agro-ecological zones: a case study in critical land of Java Island, Indonesia. Environment, Development and Sustainability (2022) 24(2) 1878-1896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01512-y
Ngabekti, S., Setyowati, D. L., & Sugiyanto, R. (2007). The level of environmental damage in Dieng Plateau for database to conservation action. In Jurnal Manusia dan Lingkungan (Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 93–102).
Nindatu, P. I. (2019). Komunikasi Pembangunan Melalui Pemberdayaan Masyarakat untuk Pengentasan kemiskinan. Jurnal Persekptif Komunikatif, 3(2), 91–103.
Nuddin, A., Arsyad, M., Putera, M. I., Nuringsih, N., & Teshome, T. T. (2019). Making the case for institutional support on designing agroforestry technology models for rehabilitating critical lands. Forest and Society, 3(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5975
Odoom, D. (2020). Understanding Development Communication: A Review of Selected Literature. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 1(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2020055
Rogers, E. M. (1976). Komunikasi dan Pembangunan, Perspektif Kritis. Terjemahan Dasmar Nurdin. LP3ES.
Surya, J. A., Nuraini, Y., & Widianto. (2017). Study of Soil Porosity in Providing Several Types of Organic Materials in Robusta Coffee Plantation. Journal of Soil and Land Resources, 4(1), 463–471.
Thomas, P. N., & Fliert, E. van de. (2014). Interrogating the Theory and Practice of Communication for Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137426314
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T, W., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013). RAMESES publication standards: Meta-narrative reviews. BMC Medicine, 11, 20. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-20.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Indonesian Journal of Social Responsibility Review (IJSRR)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.